Published January 31, 2024
By Brenda Wintrode and Pamela Wood
The Baltimore Banner
Del. Luke Clippinger, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, right, announces new juvenile justice legislation in the Maryland State House lobby. Beside him are Sen. Will Smith, chairman of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, at far left, and Gov. Wes Moore, center. (Ulysses Muñoz/The Baltimore Banner)
In response to Maryland communities crying out for public safety, powerful committee leaders revealed proposed changes to juvenile laws they said were needed to keep some children from falling through the cracks.
Lawmakers explained during the Wednesday news conference that the system needed to change. They proposed measures they said will ensure that youths participate in their rehabilitation and will hold state and local officials accountable for outcomes.
Among a host of changes: Children age 10 to 12 can be charged with certain crimes, such as firearm possession and auto theft, and courts can extend probation limits so youths can complete rehabilitative services. These moves have disappointed advocates who say they reverse reforms intended to divert youths away from the legal system.
The plan announced Wednesday comes after months of public pressure on lawmakers to curb an increase in some types of juvenile crime. Ahead of the lawmaking session, legislators listened to law enforcement, public defenders, academics and more and pored over the system looking for gaps.
“While youth offenders account for less than 10% of the crimes committed, unfortunately, it is clear that they become the largest part of the crime perception challenge in Maryland,” Senate President Bill Ferguson said.
The Baltimore Democrat said officials and lawmakers will use budget, legislation and executive orders to support state goals for accountability, rehabilitation and collaboration. And he implored state agencies to work together.
“We need all state and local agencies to collaborate across the system to ensure that families and kids are not slipping through the cracks,” he said.
House Judiciary Chair Del. Luke Clippinger called the bill a “comprehensive step forward,” but also acknowledged the challenges of drafting laws that impact the lives of children.
“It hits us in an emotional place because we don’t want to see kids that way,” Clippinger said from a podium in the State House. “We want to believe that they can do better, we know that they can be better. And yeah, sometimes they don’t.”
And sometimes the systems in place to help rehabilitate juveniles simply don’t work, he said. He said the legislature has tried to find the best way forward to hold youths accountable, give victims confidence in the system and increase systemic oversight.
Here’s how Clippinger and his Senate bill co-sponsor, Sen. Will Smith, outlined the proposal.
Courts will have jurisdiction over children ages 10 to 12 for some crimes, including illegal weapon or gun possession, car theft, animal abuse or a third-degree sex offense, according to the bill. Clippinger said this population was likely small: “We think that they’re serious enough cases that they should be brought in.” That means these youths now could face adjudication in the formal system. The Juvenile Justice Reform Act of 2022 barred police from charging children younger than 13 with nonviolent misdemeanors.
Courts would be able to extend the amount of time a youth could be on probation to make sure they complete rehabilitative services. And more probation time could kick in after two unexcused absences from certain treatments, such as mental health and drug treatment programs, Smith said. The Montgomery County Democrat said the expansion was “moderate,” adding, “You have to have the ability to supervise and also to provide services to the extent that they’re available to that child and the time that we have.”
Smith said local law enforcement would be trained on the proper implementation of the Child Interrogation Protection Act, a law that requires youths to have a conversation with an attorney to better understand their rights before a police interrogation.
There will also be an inventory of available children’s services, Smith said. Nonprofit service providers collapsed during the pandemic and the previous administration failed to fill vacancies. This void meant a lag in children getting needed services and probation ending before a program could have been completed.
Should the bill become law, police would be required to fill out a report for every interaction with a child. “You can’t keep track of what’s happened in the background of these kids’ lives if police officers didn’t write a report when they arrested him in the first place,” Clippinger said.
Lawmakers will construct an oversight body to study the juvenile system and determine which programs work and which don’t. The group will include law enforcement, public defenders, advocates for children, and children who have been in the system.
Clippinger cautioned the adjustments will take time and effort to implement.
“If you’re looking for the thing that is going to perfectly solve all of your problems, you’re not in the right place,” he said.